Legal Opinion

Olsen & Company, Inc. v. Lunsford

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided February 11, 1959No. 37545, 37557PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Townsend, Judge.

Error is assigned on the following excerpt from the charge: “If you find that there occurred such an extraordinary and unforeseen freshet or downpour of rain as could not have been in the contemplation of defendant at the time he accomplished the tortious acts, if you find that he did in fact accomplish such acts, then no recovery can be had, if you find that the loss and damage to plaintiff resulted proximately from such freshet and rain alone.” The plaintiff in error contends that the court here confuses the rule of liability in tort with that ini contract, this case having…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Williams v. GrierSupreme Court of Georgia · 1943
  2. Whitaker v. Jones, McDougald, Smith, Pew Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1943
  3. Stallings v. Georgia Power Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1942
  4. Wright v. Southern Railway Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1940
  5. Carr & Co. v. Southern Railway Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1913

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Lewis J. McDermott III and Criterion Mills, Inc. v. Middle East Carpet Company, AssociatedCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1987
  2. Carolina Industrial Products, Inc. v. Learjet, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 2001
  3. Rodrigue v. MendenhallCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API