Legal Opinion

Sherrill-Russell Lumber Co. v. Krug Lumber Co.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided June 6, 1924PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

* (1) Sales, 35 Cyc, p. 118, 1926 Anno; (2) Sales, 35 Cyc, p. 222. 216 M.A.] (3.) Customs Usages, 17 C.J., Section 33; (4.) Sales, 35 Cyc, p. 222; (5.) Customs Usages, 17 C.J., Section 33; (6.) Customs Usages, 17 C.J., Section 33. This is an action by plaintiff for a balance claimed on fifteen cars of lumber sold defendant. Defendant filed a counterclaim, in which it admits there is a balance due plaintiff of $2460.92 on ten cars of lumber which it accepted and which met the required grades and specifications, but states that it advanced $4916.39 on five cars of lumber which it rejected…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Staroske v. Pulitzer Publishing Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1911
  2. Estes v. Desnoyers Shoe Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1900
  3. Keystone v. MoiesSupreme Court of Missouri · 1859
  4. Herrington v. Julius Seidel Lumber Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1922

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Jones v. West Side Buick Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1936
  2. State Ex Rel. H. K. Porter Co. v. NangleMissouri Court of Appeals · 1966
  3. HW Kastor & Sons Adv. Co. v. Grove LaboratoriesDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 1945

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API