Legal Opinion

Tompkins v. Kraemer

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided July 28, 1981No. 81-889PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NESBITT, Judge.

The plaintiffs have perfected this interlocutory appeal to review an order granting a motion to amend the final judgment of foreclosure. We have jurisdiction to review the matter as an order entered after final judgment. Fla.R.App.P. 9.130(a)(4).

A final judgment of foreclosure was entered on March 25,1981. On April 13,1981, the defendant served a motion to alter or amend the final judgment so as to authorize the defendants to pay the judgment in monthly installments, which motion was granted.

A motion to alter or amend a judgment must be served not more than ten days after entry…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. American National Bank v. LauDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1972
  2. Kitzmiller v. Southeast Services, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1978
  3. Duncan v. AllmanDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1979
  4. Environs Palm Beach v. DonovanDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1978

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Marsh & McLennan, Inc. v. Aerolineas Nacionales Del EcuadorDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1988
  2. Clearwater Oaks Bank v. PlumtreeDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985
  3. Mocegui v. Public Service Mut. Ins. Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2002
  4. International Design & Display Group, Inc. v. Barnett Bank of South Florida, N.A.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API