State ex rel. Handley v. Pearse
Nebraska Supreme Court
Original application for mandamus. cited; Vanderlip v. Derby, 19 Neb., 165; State v. Weber, 20 Id., 467; Steinhross v. Hurlbert, Id., 519 ; State v. Hanlon, 24 Id., 608 ; Felton v. Drummond, 21 Id., 492; Lambert v. Stephens, 29 Id., 283. cited : Williams v. Lowe, 4 Reb., 396; Fritz v. Grosnicklaus, 20 Id., 417; Mulhollan v. Scroggin, 8 Id., 204; Dorrington v. Meyer, 8 Id., 211; Hale v. Bender, 13 Id., 67; Spencer v. Thistle, Id., 227.
1Opinion of the CourtMaxwell, J.
This is an application for a mandamus to compel Frank T. Pearse, C. W. Pearse, D. R. Kelley, G. B. Zook, Isaac Tonnamaker, and F. M. Emerson, trustees of the village of Diller, to reassemble and cancel a license to sell intoxicating drinks, issued to Mates Cerving, and to hear a remonstrance against the issuing of said license to said Cerving. Issues have been joined and a very large amount of testimony taken in the case.
It appears from the record that on or about April 20, 1890, Mates Cerving filed -with the village board of Diller a petition, duly signed By the requisite number of persons,…
2Cited by1 opinion
- In re Jorgensen for a Liquor LicenseNebraska Supreme Court · 1906