Legal Opinion

Mullen v. Howard

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided October 13, 1914No. 3080PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Error from County Court, Love County; R. A. Keller, Judge. Action by Geo. C. Howard against J. S. Mullen and others. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendants bring error.

1Opinion of the CourtKane, C. J.

This was an action for the recovery of the sum of $200 as rent for certain real estate, commenced by the defendant in error, plaintiff below, against the plaintiffs in error, defendants below, before a justice of-the peace, where a default judgment was rendered in favor of the plaintiff. Thereafter the cause was appealed to the county court where, upon trial, judgment was also rendered for the plaintiff, to reverse which this proceeding in error was commenced.

The complaint stated facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action under section 3802, Rev. Raws 1910, which provides:

• “The…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Wilbur v. CollinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1896

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Moffer v. JonesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
  2. Mullen v. CarterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  3. Hughes v. WatkinsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
  4. Moffer v. JonesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API