Usery v. Lacy
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Dissent
KELLEHER, District Judge:
Respectfully, I dissent.
I
The result achieved by the majority is so patently wrong that any basis upon which it can be avoided seems desirable. The warrantless inspection of the job site made here by the OSHA inspector over the continued objection of Respondent Lacy should bring this case within the rule of Marshall v. Barlow’s, Inc., 436 U.S. 307, 98 S.Ct. 1816, 56 L.Ed.2d 305 (1978), which proscribes warrantless inspections by OSHA’s inspectors. Barlow’s should have retrospective application in a case where, as here, the inspection was made over the continued…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Marshall v. Barlow's, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Wickard v. FilburnSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- United States v. Dye Construction Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1975
- United States v. Ernest O. D. CampbellCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1965
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.