Legal Opinion

Certain Underwriters at Lloyds v. REGIONS INSURANCE, INC.

District Court, E.D. Arkansas

Decided May 11, 2009No. 4:08CV01843-WRWPublished

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

WM. R. WILSON, JR., District Judge.

Pending is the Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 10). Plaintiff has responded, 1 and Defendant has replied. 2 For the reasons set out below, Defendant’s Motion is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part.

I. BACKGROUND 3

Insurisk Excess & Surplus Lines (“Insurisk”) is a subsidiary of Regions Insurance Company, Inc. (“Regions”). Plaintiff (“Underwriters”) and Regions entered into a Binding Authority Agreement, which authorized Insurisk to act as an agent and bind Underwriters to certain types of insurance coverage in certain regions. The Binding…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Holloway v. LockhartCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1987
  3. Larson MacHine, Inc. v. WallaceSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1980
  4. Inland Oil & Transport Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1979
  5. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Co., and Third Party v. United States Lines Company, Third PartyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1958

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API