Legal Opinion

Daniel Casimiro Trinidad v. Warden, California City Detention Facility

District Court, E.D. California

Decided August 12, 2026No. 1:26-cv-05420Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 DANIEL CASIMIRO TRINIDAD, Case No. 1:26-cv-05420-KES-EPG-HC 12 Petitioner, ORDER FOR SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEFING REGARDING RESPONDENT’S MOTION 13 v. TO VACATE NO-TRANSFER ORDER 14 WARDEN, CALIFORNIA CITY DETENTION FACILITY, 15 Respondent. 16 17 Petitioner is an immigration detainee proceeding pro se with a petition for writ of habeas 18 corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. 19 On July 14, 2026, the Court ordered that “Respondents shall NOT TRANSFER Petitioner 20 out of this District.” (ECF No. 5.) On July 29, 2026,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Yuzi Cui v. Merrick GarlandCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API