Legal Opinion

Paint and Lead Works v. . Spruill

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided September 19, 1923PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHoke, J.

In 23 R. C. L., 1433, it is said: “That where goods are ordered of a specific quality, which the seller undertakes to deliver to a carrier to be forwarded to the buyer at a distant place, the right of inspection, in the absence of any specific provision in the contract, continues until the goods are received and accepted at their ultimate destination. In such case the carrier is not the agent of the buyer to accept the goods as corresponding with the contract, although he may be his agent to receive and transport them.” This is the rule very generally prevailing on the subject, and obtains in…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Pope v. AllisSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
  2. Pierson v. . CrooksNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
  3. Alden v. HartMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1894
  4. Manufacturing Co. v. . GraySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1899
  5. Richardson v. . WoodruffSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1919

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Renfro Hosiery Mills Company v. National Cash Register CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1977
  2. Baker v. J. C. Watson Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Union Paint & Varnish Co. v. DeanSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1927

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API