Legal Opinion

Guffin v. Linney

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 15, 1882PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Error from Oloud District Court. Ejectment, brought by Guffin and wife against Linney, to recover certain lots in the city of Concordia. Trial at the August Term, 1880, of the district court, and judgment for the defendant. The plaintiffs bring the case here. The opinion states the facts.

1Opinion of the Court

*718The opinion of the court was delivered by

"Valentine, J.:

This was an action of ejectment, brought by J. C. Guffin and S. C. Guffin, his wife, against Edward Linney, to recover certain lots in the city of Concordia. These lots were originally a part of the southwest quarter of the southwest quarter of section thirty-three, in township five, of range three. On July 29, 1871, the probate judge of Cloud county filed in the United States land office a declaratory statement, under the act of congress of March 2, 1867, (14 U. S. Stat. at Large, p. 541,) claiming this land, along with other land, as a…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Chicago Lumber Co. v. FretzSupreme Court of Kansas · 1893
  2. Hall v. North Ogden CityUtah Supreme Court · 1946
  3. Bingham v. City of Walla Walla, Washington Territory1887
  4. City of Guthrie v. BeamerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1895
  5. Marysville Investment Co. v. HolleCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1897

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API