Legal Opinion
S'Doia v. Dhabhar
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided May 7, 1999PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
—Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Supreme Court properly denied the motion of Gail C. Johnson, M.D., John R. Tretter, M.D., and James Cesare, M.D. (defendants) for summary judgment dismissing the complaint against them in this medical malpractice action. Defendants failed to meet their initial burden by their conclusory statements that their treatment of plaintiffs decedent did not deviate from accepted standards of care (see, Alvarez v Prospect Hosp., 68 NY2d 320, 324; Winegrad v New York Univ. Med. Ctr., 64 NY2d 851, 853). The deposition testimony and medical records…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Alvarez v. Prospect HospitalNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
- Winegrad v. New York University Medical CenterNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
- Maust v. ArseneauAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
3Cited by7 opinions
- Padilla v. Verczky-PorterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- Kremer v. Buffalo General HospitalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- McDaniel v. KeckAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- Slazak v. CapozziAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
- Beckwith v. BowenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2018
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.