Legal Opinion

Oscar Gruss & Son v. United States

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided March 13, 1967No. 1060PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Per curiam

Appellant is a bondholder of the New York, New Haven &.Hartford Railroad Company (the New Haven), which is now undergoing a reorganization under § 77 of the Bankruptcy Act, 11 U. S. C. § 205. On April 6, 1966, the Interstate Commerce Commission directed inclusion of the New Haven in the merger of the New York Central Railroad Company and the Pennsylvania Railroad Company as soon as terms and conditions could be settled, but approved the Penn-Central merger and authorized its consummation prior to such inclusion. Appellant then petitioned the Commission to reconsider this order. The Commission…

2Cited by17 opinions

  1. New Haven Inclusion CasesSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Erie-Lackawanna Railroad Company v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1967
  3. New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1968
  4. United States v. 101.88 Acres of LandCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
  5. United States v. 58.16 Acres of Land, More or Less, Situated in Clinton County, State of Illinois, and George Cooley, and Unknown OwnersCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1973

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API