Legal Opinion

Bullock v. Otto Imports, LLC

District Court, W.D. Kentucky

Decided March 29, 2022No. 4:19-cv-00149Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY OWENSBORO DIVISION CHAD BULLOCK PLAINTIFF v. No. 4:19-cv-149-BJB OTTO IMPORTS, LLC, ET AL. DEFENDANTS * * * * * MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER Chad Bullock alleges that he was burned by exploding Samsung lithium-ion batteries he bought for his electronic cigarette from Otto Imports, LLC’s Amazon webstore. Complaint (DN 1-2) ¶¶ 44, 48–49. According to Bullock’s Complaint, LG Chem Co., Ltd. (“LG Chem”) and LG Chem America, Inc. (“LGCAI”) designed and manufactured the batteries. ¶¶ 4, 10, 50. But according to declarations filed by…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  3. Goodyear Dunlop Tires Operations, S. A. v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  4. Asahi Metal Industry Co. v. Superior Court of Cal., Solano Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
  5. Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. v. Superior Court of Cal., San Francisco Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 2017

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API