Legal Opinion

Blende v. Stanford

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided July 14, 1965No. 8645PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STRUCKMEYER, Vice Chief Justice.

On February 4, 1965, petitioner filed with this Court his petition for alternative writ of mandamus, alleging in effect the failure of the court below to comply with the mandate of this Court. Blende v. Maricopa County Medical Society, 96 Ariz. 240, 393 P.2d 926. We ordered that the alternative writ issue, directing the trial court to immediately proceed to trial upon the issues as stated in this Court’s opinion or, in the alternative, show cause why the writ should not be made permanent.

Originally O. E. Blende filed a petition for a writ of mandamus in the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. In Re Sanford Fork & Tool Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1895
  2. In Re PottsSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  3. United States v. United States District Court for the Southern District of New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  4. Blende v. Maricopa County Medical SocietyArizona Supreme Court · 1964
  5. Delaware, Lackawanna & Western Railroad v. RellstabSupreme Court of the United States · 1928

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Holmes v. Hoemako HospitalArizona Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Maricopa County Medical Society v. BlendeArizona Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Maricopa County Medical Society v. BlendeCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1967
  4. Holmes v. Hoemako HospitalArizona Supreme Court · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API