Bowers v. Wurzburg
West Virginia Supreme Court
1DissentDavis, Justice
(Filed April 12, 2000)
I dissent because the majority opinion obliterates existing standards for challenging a motion for summary judgment. By addressing the instant appeal on the merits, the majority has instructed the bar that it is no longer necessary for a plaintiff to respond in the circuit court to a defendant’s motion for summary judgment. I will first review the procedural facts relevant to my dissent, and follow with a discussion of the applicable law.
On July 20, 1998, Gretchen L. Wurzburg (hereinafter “Ms. Wurzburg”), a defendant below, filed a motion for summary judgment. The record…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Lujan v. National Wildlife FederationSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Painter v. PeavyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1994
- Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Federal Insurance Co. of New YorkWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1963
- Williams v. Precision Coil, Inc.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1995
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.