Legal Opinion · Dissent

Bowers v. Wurzburg

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided April 12, 2000No. 26218Published

1DissentDavis, Justice

(Filed April 12, 2000)

I dissent because the majority opinion obliterates existing standards for challenging a motion for summary judgment. By addressing the instant appeal on the merits, the majority has instructed the bar that it is no longer necessary for a plaintiff to respond in the circuit court to a defendant’s motion for summary judgment. I will first review the procedural facts relevant to my dissent, and follow with a discussion of the applicable law.

On July 20, 1998, Gretchen L. Wurzburg (hereinafter “Ms. Wurzburg”), a defendant below, filed a motion for summary judgment. The record…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Lujan v. National Wildlife FederationSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  3. Painter v. PeavyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Federal Insurance Co. of New YorkWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1963
  5. Williams v. Precision Coil, Inc.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1995

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API