Legal Opinion
In re the Accounting of Wolf
New York Surrogate's Court
Decided April 9, 1947PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
McGarey, S.
The compensation requested by the attorney-trustee for the legal services rendered by Mm appears to be reasonable, and will be allowed in the amount requested. The fee is to be allocated as follows: Eleven fifteenths to principal and four fifteenths to income.
The objections to the proposed computation of the trustees’ commissions are disposed of as follows:
The first objection is sustained. (Matter of Pessano, 181 Misc. 295; Matter of Cushing, 53 N. Y. S. 2d 714; Matter of Boettger, 184 Misc. 103.)
The second objection is dismissed. The court holds that normal income commissions…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- In Re the Accounting of Chemical Bank & Trust Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1938
- In re the Estate of PessanoNew York Surrogate's Court · 1944
- In re the Accounting of BoettgerNew York Surrogate's Court · 1945
3Cited by1 opinion
- In re the Accounting of WolfAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1947