Legal Opinion

Racquel Lividini v. Harold L. Goldstein

New York Court of Appeals

Decided October 14, 2021No. 57Published

1Opinion of the Court

State of New York MEMORANDUM Court of Appeals This memorandum is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the New York Reports. No. 57 Racquel Lividini, Respondent, v. Harold L. Goldstein et al., Defendants, Rye Ambulatory Surgery Center, L.L.C. et al., Appellants. Daniel S. Ratner, for appellants. Frank A. Longo, for respondent. MEMORANDUM: The order of the Appellate Division, insofar as appealed from, should be reversed, with costs, so much of the order of Supreme Court as granted the motions for change of -1- -2- No. 57 venue by defendants Rye Ambulatory Surgery Center,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Andros v. RoderickAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
  2. Young Sun Chung v. KwahAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
  3. Saxe v. OB/GYN Associates, P. C.New York Court of Appeals · 1995
  4. Travelers Indemnity Co. v. Uchenna NnamaniAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
  5. Singh v. Empire International, Ltd.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API