Chapman v. California
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the Court 1
386 U.S. 18 (1967)
CHAPMAN ET AL.
v.
CALIFORNIA.
No. 95.
Supreme Court of United States.
Argued December 7-8, 1966.
Decided February 20, 1967.
CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA.
Morris Lavine argued the cause and filed briefs for petitioners.
Arlo E. Smith, Chief Assistant Attorney General of California, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Thomas C. Lynch, Attorney General, Doris H. Maier, Assistant Attorney General, and Raymond M. Momboisse, Deputy Attorney General.
2Opinion of the Court · BlackJustice Black
Petitioners, Ruth Elizabeth Chapman and Thomas LeRoy Teale, were convicted in a California state court…
Also in this document: Concurrence; Dissent.
3Cases cited56 opinions
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Kotteakos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Marbury v. MadisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1803
51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by33 opinions
- People v. LeonCalifornia Supreme Court · 2015
- People v. NelsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 2016
- People v. GrimesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2016
- People v. SandovalCalifornia Supreme Court · 2015
- Willard Hall v. F. HawsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.