Legal Opinion · Dissent

In the Matter of Sales Tax Liability of Pirmantgen

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided December 23, 2008No. 24758Published

1DissentGilbertson, Chief Justice

[¶ 20.] I respectfully dissent. The Court’s opinion neglects to consider that “ ‘statutes allowing tax exemptions are exactingly and narrowly construed in favor of the taxing entity.’ ” Mauch v. South Dakota Dept. of Revenue and Regulation, 2007 SD 90, ¶ 8, 738 N.W.2d 537, 540 (quoting Watertown Coop. Elevator Ass’n v. SD Dept. of Rev., 2001 SD 56, ¶ 10, 627 N.W.2d 167, 171). The Court initially errs in giving the benefit of the doubt to the taxpayers under the view that this is a question of application of the tax. However, the circuit court in essence found that the taxpayers were exempt…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In Re the Sales Tax Liability of Valley Queen CheeseSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1986
  2. WATERTOWN COOP. ELEVATOR v. Dept. of Rev.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Mauch v. South Dakota Department of Revenue & RegulationSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API