Legal Opinion
Opinion of the Justices
Supreme Court of Alabama
Decided February 16, 2006No. 383PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*194Members of the House of Representatives
Alabama State House
Montgomery, Alabama 36130
Dear Representatives:
We have received House Resolution No. 123, requesting the opinions of the Justices of the Supreme Court as to whether the constitutional amendment proposed by House Bill 434, if ratified, would violate the Equal Protection Clause or the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution. House Resolution No. 123 reads as follows:
“BE IT RESOLVED BY THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES OF THE LEGISLATURE OF ALABAMA, That we respectfully request the Honor*195able Chief…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Nordlinger v. HahnSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Carmichael v. Southern Coal & Coke Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
- McDonald v. Board of Election Comm'rs of ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- State Bd. of Tax Commr's of Ind. v. JacksonSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Allegheny Pittsburgh Coal Co. v. Commission of Webster Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- In re Op. of the JusticesSupreme Court of Alabama · 2018
- Opinion of the JusticesSupreme Court of Alabama · 2012