Pinkston v. Hartley
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
This is an appeal from a judgment in favor of John W. Hartley, et al. The trial judge found that an implied easement existed for a sewer line and granted injunctive relief ordering appellants to remove an obstruction they had placed in the field lines of appellees' septic tank. We affirm.
This case involves a bitter family dispute. Appellant, Thomas Pinkston, deeded to his daughter and son-in-law, Phillippa and John Hartley, property on which there was situated a house. The field lines from the septic tank on the property deeded to the Hartleys ran onto the Pinkstons' property. Although there…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Mazer v. Jackson Ins. AgencySupreme Court of Alabama · 1976
- Mooradian v. Canal Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Alabama · 1961
- Silverman v. Charmac, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1982
- Stringer Realty Co. v. City of GadsdenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1951
- Consolidated Foods Corp. v. Water Works & Sanitary Sewer BoardSupreme Court of Alabama · 1975
3Cited by11 opinions
- Patel v. Planning Board of North AndoverMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1989
- Hereford v. Gingo-Morgan ParkSupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
- Ford v. Jackson Square, Ltd.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1989
- Otto v. GillespieCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1990
- England v. ArringtonCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1993
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.