Legal Opinion

Pinkston v. Hartley

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided July 2, 1987No. 85-1481PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This is an appeal from a judgment in favor of John W. Hartley, et al. The trial judge found that an implied easement existed for a sewer line and granted injunctive relief ordering appellants to remove an obstruction they had placed in the field lines of appellees' septic tank. We affirm.

This case involves a bitter family dispute. Appellant, Thomas Pinkston, deeded to his daughter and son-in-law, Phillippa and John Hartley, property on which there was situated a house. The field lines from the septic tank on the property deeded to the Hartleys ran onto the Pinkstons' property. Although there…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Mazer v. Jackson Ins. AgencySupreme Court of Alabama · 1976
  2. Mooradian v. Canal Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Alabama · 1961
  3. Silverman v. Charmac, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1982
  4. Stringer Realty Co. v. City of GadsdenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1951
  5. Consolidated Foods Corp. v. Water Works & Sanitary Sewer BoardSupreme Court of Alabama · 1975

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Patel v. Planning Board of North AndoverMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1989
  2. Hereford v. Gingo-Morgan ParkSupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
  3. Ford v. Jackson Square, Ltd.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1989
  4. Otto v. GillespieCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1990
  5. England v. ArringtonCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1993

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API