Legal Opinion
Sydney Grossman Hotel Corp. v. Lakewood Water Co.
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Decided May 19, 1958PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered
Pee Cueiam.
We see no difference between this case and Reimann v. Monmouth Consolidated Water Co., 9 N. J. 134 (1952). The great weight of authority is in accord with that decision. Annotation, 62 A. L. R. 1205 (1929).
The question is a close one, but an existing rule of law should not be overturned unless its injustice is clear. We are not satisfied that Reimann is wrong in its overall application.
The judgment is accordingly affirmed.
2Cited by10 opinions
- Weinberg v. DingerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1987
- Hut v. AntonioNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1967
- Bongo v. New Jersey Bell Telephone Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1991
- Notare v. NotareNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1960
- Sydney Grossman Hotel Corp. v. Lakewood Water Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1958
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.