Legal Opinion · Dissent

Susan Ackerman v. State of Iowa, Iowa Workforce Development, Teresa Wahlert, Teresa Hillary, and Devon Lewis

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided June 15, 2018No. 16-0287Published

1Dissent

WATERMAN, Justice (dissenting).

I respectfully dissent. This is the wrong case to decide whether contract employees can bring a common law claim for wrongful termination in violation of public policy, a tort specifically created to provide a remedy for at-will employees. Susan Ackerman is not a private contract employee; she is a state employee with both statutory remedies and contract remedies under a collective bargaining agreement. The majority ignores the dispositive threshold question of whether a government employee in Ackerman's position with statutory remedies can also sue under the…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. D'Ulisse-Cupo v. Board of Directors of Notre Dame High SchoolSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
  2. Tomlinson v. Board of EducationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
  3. Springer v. Weeks and Leo Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1988
  4. Wagoner v. Elkin City Schools' Board of EducationCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1994
  5. Christopher J. Godfrey v. State of Iowa Terry Branstad, Governor of the State of Iowa, Individually and in His Official Capacity Kimberly Reynolds, Lieutenant Governor of the State of Iowa, Individually and in Her Official Capacity Jeffrey Boeyink, Chief of Staff to the Governor of the State of Iowa, Individually and in His Official Capacity Brenna Findley, Legal Counsel to the Governor of TheSupreme Court of Iowa · 2017

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API