Legal Opinion
U.S. for Use and Ben. of Clark Bros. Contractors v. Bechtel Constructors Corp.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided December 24, 1991No. 89-16557UnpublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
951 F.2d 365
NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.
UNITED STATES of America for the use and benefit of CLARK
BROTHERS CONTRACTORS, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
BECHTEL CONSTRUCTORS CORPORATION; Industrial Indemnity
Company; United States Fire Insurance Company; Baltrusch
Construction Co., Inc.; and Commercial Union Insurance
Company, Defendants-Appellants.
No. 89-16557.
United States Court…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Dorina Mateyko, and Raymond Mateyko v. Thomas Felix, Michael Serafin, the City of Los AngelesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- Electrical Construction & Maintenance Company, Inc. v. Maeda Pacific CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
- United States v. Portac, Inc., United States of America v. Howard L. WolfCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- Consuelo Stephanie Pye and Iris Lee Hammer v. James Mitchell, Arthur Mitchell and Cinema Seven, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978
- Northwest Acceptance Corp. v. Lynnwood Equipment, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Steve Asche v. United States of AmericaDistrict Court, D. Montana · 2026