State ex rel. Patterson v. Tittman
Missouri Court of Appeals
Appeal from the St. Louis City Circuit Cotvrt. — Hon. Jacob Klein, Judge. (1) The plea of the statute of limitations contained in the appellant’s amended answer should have been sustained. 1 Revised Statutes, 1889, secs. 183, 5329; Johnson v. Smith’s Adm’r, 27 Mo. 591; Coleman v. Willi, 46 Mo. 236; Stateexrel. v. Hoshaw, 86 Mo. 193; Bentv.
Read the full summary
Appeal from the St. Louis City Circuit Cotvrt. — Hon. Jacob Klein, Judge. (1) The plea of the statute of limitations contained in the appellant’s amended answer should have been sustained. 1 Revised Statutes, 1889, secs. 183, 5329; Johnson v. Smith’s Adm’r, 27 Mo. 591; Coleman v. Willi, 46 Mo. 236; Stateexrel. v. Hoshaw, 86 Mo. 193; Bentv. Priest, 86 Mo. 475; State v. Blake, 2 Ohio St. 147; Bridges v. Blake, 106 Ind. 332; Auchaumpaugh v. Schmidt, 70 Iowa, 642; Batcliff v. Leunig, 30 Ind. 289; Bonham v. The People, 102 111. 434; -Glass v. Woolf’s Adm’r, 82 Ala. 281; Mann v. Everts, 64 Wis.…
1Opinion
ON MOTION FOB BEHEAEING.
Bond, J.
— Appellant cites the case of Haeussler v. Laclede Bank, 23 Mo. App. 282, as a controlling decision of this court entitling him to a rehearing of this cause. I do not concur with my associates in refusing the rehearing prayed for by appellant, and I deem their opinion on the hearing of this cause contrary to the rule expressed in the opinion of this court in Haeussler v. Laclede Bank, supra.
The clerk of this court is hereby ordered to certify and transfer the original papers on file in this cause, and a full and complete transcript of the proceedings of this…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Haeussler v. Laclede BankMissouri Court of Appeals · 1886