Legal Opinion

United States v. Lopez

District Court, D. Puerto Rico

Decided February 10, 1994No. Cr. No. 92-162(GG/CC)Published

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

LAFFITTE, District Judge.

Before the Court are the February 9,1993 motions of defendants Luis Cartegena-Carrasquillo (“Cartegena”), Carmen Gloria Rodriquez (“Gloria”) and Carlos Lugo Lopez (“Lugo”) requesting a stay of the criminal proceedings. On the same date defendants filed notices of appeal of this Court’s February 8, 1994 order denying dismissal of the indictments on double jeopardy grounds. For the reasons set forth below the Court finds that defendants’ motions are frivolous and dilatory. Accordingly, we decline to grant a stay of these proceedings.

DISCUSSION

A District Court may…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States v. William George Dunbar, M. D.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
  2. United States v. Carroll Leppo, United States of America v. Leppo, CarrollCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1980
  3. United States v. Fred B. Black, Jr.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1985
  4. United States v. Daniel Phisco Ramirez, United States v. Jairo Vanegas-Ortiz, United States v. Jose Victor Santiago-Escobar, United States v. Roberto Piedrahita-Santiago, United States v. Anibal Pelaez-Escobar, United States v. Reyes Cardales-BarriosCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API