In re Berry v. DeWald garnishment
District Court, D. Kansas
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS L.B., a minor, ) by her Next Friend Keven Berry; and ) A.N., a minor, ) by his Guardian Ad Litem, Amy D. DeWald, ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) Case No. 25-1086-JWL ) THE PRINCETON EXCESS AND SURPLUS ) LINES INSURANCE COMPANY, ) ) Defendant. ) ) _______________________________________) MEMORANDUM AND ORDER In this garnishment action, which was removed from state court, a judgment creditor (hereinafter “plaintiff”) seeks to recover insurance proceeds from garnishee The Princeton Excess and Surplus Lines Insurance Company (“Princeton”),…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Murphy Brothers, Inc. v. Michetti Pipe Stringing, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Tuck v. United Services Automobile Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1988
- Lee v. Max Intern., LLCCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2011
- Wade v. Emcasco InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2007
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.