Legal Opinion

In re Berry v. DeWald garnishment

District Court, D. Kansas

Decided July 9, 2025No. 6:25-cv-01086Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS L.B., a minor, ) by her Next Friend Keven Berry; and ) A.N., a minor, ) by his Guardian Ad Litem, Amy D. DeWald, ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) Case No. 25-1086-JWL ) THE PRINCETON EXCESS AND SURPLUS ) LINES INSURANCE COMPANY, ) ) Defendant. ) ) _______________________________________) MEMORANDUM AND ORDER In this garnishment action, which was removed from state court, a judgment creditor (hereinafter “plaintiff”) seeks to recover insurance proceeds from garnishee The Princeton Excess and Surplus Lines Insurance Company (“Princeton”),…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Murphy Brothers, Inc. v. Michetti Pipe Stringing, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1999
  3. Tuck v. United Services Automobile Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1988
  4. Lee v. Max Intern., LLCCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2011
  5. Wade v. Emcasco InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2007

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API