Legal Opinion

Jenkins v. Rancocas Const. Co.

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided August 25, 1932No. 4876PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

BUFFINGTON, Circuit Judge.

In the court below Charles E. Smith and William Jenkins filed libels alleging they had maritime liens against five pile drivers formerly owned by the Armstrong & Latta Company, their employer, but now owned by the purchasers thereof at a sheriff’s sale of that firm’s property. A commissioner, who took the testimony, and the court found the claimants had no lien and discharged the libels. Thereupon they appealed.

The facts of the ease and law applicable as stated by the trial court are quoted below, we adding thereto that Armstrong & Latta were a constructing firm and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. The J. S. WardenDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1910
  2. Brig E. A. BarnardU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Pennsylvania · 1880
  3. Jepson v. The AmericaDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1893
  4. Miller v. The Maggie P.District Court, E.D. Missouri · 1887

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Burdine v. WaldenCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API