Legal Opinion

Talbot Paving Co. v. Common Council

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 8, 1892PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Mandamus. Relator applied for mandamus to compel the respondent to approve a paving contract. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtGrant, J.

Relator applies for the writ of mandamus to compel the respondent to approve a contract for pay*263ing a portion of Griswold street, made with it by the board of public works.

The charter of the city of Detroit provides that such work shall be done under the supervision of the board of public works, and upon contracts and under specifications to be prepared by such board, and approved by the common council. This board is required to advertise for proposals to execute the work according to plans and specifications, and to contract with the lowest responsible bidder. The board may. reject all…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State v. PrestonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1874

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Michigan Mutual Fire Insurance v. Wayne Circuit JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Talbot Paving Co. v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Matter of Application of Air Terminal Services, Inc.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1964
  4. Chatfield v. Lenawee Circuit JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1905
  5. Chandler v. Board of EducationMichigan Supreme Court · 1895

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API