Legal Opinion

Fontana v. Hugo International, Inc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided February 21, 2001No. 3D00-3125PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCope, J.

Edward and Brian Fontana appeal an order denying their motion to dismiss or transfer for improper venue. We reverse.

Hugo International is a shoe wholesaler which is headquartered in Miami-Dade County. It imports and sells women’s shoes to retail stores throughout the United States. For a number of years, the Fontanas were sales agents for Hugo. They live in Pinellas County, but traveled nationwide on Hugo’s behalf.

According to Hugo’s complaint, the Fon-tanas (while employed by Hugo) went to California and concluded an agreement to represent Hugo’s competitor, Sideout Shoe *434Company.1 Hugo…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Williams v. GoldsmithDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1993
  2. Langan Engineering v. Harris ConstructorsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1999

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Asbury v. ArriagaDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 2025
  2. Asbury v. ArriagaDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2025
  3. BROWN & BROWN OF FLORIDA, INC., etc. v. TZADIK ACQUISITIONS, LLC, etc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2023
  4. Miami Beach Healthcare Group, Ltd. v. Robert Bruce Donoway, M.D.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API