Legal Opinion

McIntosh v. Miner

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided February 15, 1899PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Appeal by the defendants, Henry 0. Miner and another, from a judgment of the Supreme Court in favor of the plaintiff, entered in the office of the clerk of the county of New York on the 25th day of May, 1898, upon the verdict of a jury, and also from an order entered in said clerk’s office on the 6th day of June, 189S, denying the defendants’ motion for a new trial made upon the minutes.

1Opinion of the Court

Ingraham, J.:

The parties to this action made a contract, dated February 1,1896, by which Miner and Brooks, the defendants, agreed to assume the management of the plaintiff as a star in a theatrical company to be organized by them for the seasons of 1896-1897, 1897-1898, 1898-1899, and the plaintiff agreed to render services as star under the defendants’ managemant in the said company upon the terms and conditions specified in the contract. The defendants agreed to pay the plaintiff $100 per week as compensation for his services, and “ a sum equal to twenty-five per cent of the net profits…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. McCreery v. . DayNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
  2. Morehouse v. . Second Nat'l B'k of OswegoNew York Court of Appeals · 1885
  3. Nicholls v. GrangerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1896

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Goldstine v. TolmanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1914
  2. Spier v. HydeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1903
  3. Rogers-Pyatt Shellac Co. v. Starr Piano Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1925
  4. Kendall v. KendallAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1922
  5. McIntosh v. MinerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1900

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API