Eiseman v. Hawkeye Insurance
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from Pottawattamie District Court. — Hon. A. ■ B. Thornell, Judge. Action upon a policy of insurance to recover the value of the property insured, which was destroyed by fire. There was a judgment on a verdict for plaintiff. Defendant appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtBeck, J.
It is necessary to consider but a few of the numerous errors assigned and argued by appellant. The facts upon which the respective objections to the judgment are based will be stated in connection with the discussion of each.,1. FiREinsurttó°n::e?rorU0' etireci. I. The district court, in stating to the jury the issues involved in the case, informed the jury that defendant admitted in its answer that apart oí tlle goods and property covered by the policy was injured or destroyed by the fire. It is insisted that this is an erroneous statement of the *13effect of the pleadings. The defendant, in…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Edgerly v. Farmers' InsuranceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1876
- Lumbert & Co. v. PalmerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1870
- Meadows v. Hawkeye InsuranceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1883
- Fauble & Smith v. DavisSupreme Court of Iowa · 1878
- Welsh v. Des Moines Ins.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1887
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Parsons v. Grand Lodge of Ancient Order of United WorkmenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1899
- Anders v. Life Insurance ClearingNebraska Supreme Court · 1901
- National Mutual Fire Insurance v. SpragueSupreme Court of Colorado · 1907
- Brock v. Des Moines InsuranceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1895
- McCoy v. Iowa State InsuranceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1898
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.