Legal Opinion

Blake v. Thorne

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided January 10, 1888No. Civil No. 211PublishedCited by 1 opinion

APPEAL from a Judgment of the District Court of the Third Judicial District in and for the County of Yavapai. W. W. Porter, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtBarnes, J.

This was a bill to quiet the title to a mining claim. The claim in question'was located by one Hutchison in 1879, and the notice was recorded. In August, 1882, Hutchison, Symes, and Thorne, by deed of quit-claim, conveyed this claim with others to the Silver Belt Company. Afterwards, plaintiff, Blake, became the purchaser of the claim by virtue of a judicial sale. The deed of the sheriff bore date April 27, 1886. The judgment was for $19,608.87, of date of July 26, 1884. In February, 1885, the said Symes located the ground as the Richmond mining claim, and in the same month he conveyed to…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Taylor v. SecorSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  2. Forbes v. GraceySupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  3. Belcher Consolidated Gold Mining Co. v. DeferrariCalifornia Supreme Court · 1882
  4. Breeze v. HaleySupreme Court of Colorado · 1887

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Allyn v. SchultzArizona Supreme Court · 1897

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API