Legal Opinion

Bowditch v. E. T. Slattery Co.

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided May 25, 1928PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWait, J.

The plaintiffs, vendors of certain real estate, sue to recover from the defendant, the purchaser, the amount which they have paid in satisfaction of a judgment obtained against them by a broker for a commission upon the sale. • The sale agreement provided: “As the price agreed upon is based on no Broker’s Commission, being paid by either party, it is hereby agreed that the party of the second part [the defendant] shall pay all Broker’s Commission if by any chance it may be necessary to pay a Broker’s Commission.” It further provided: “If the party of the first part shall be unable to give…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Glackin v. BennettMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1917
  2. Boston & Maine Railroad v. T. Stuart & Son Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1920
  3. Old Colony Trust Co. v. ChaunceyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1913
  4. Moskow v. BurkeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1926
  5. Loughery v. Central Trust Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1927

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. New England Foundation Co. v. Elliott & Watrous, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1940
  2. Ernest F. Carlson Co. v. Fred T. Ley & Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1929
  3. Whitty Manufacturing Co. v. ClarkMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1932
  4. Buhl v. VieraMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1952
  5. Empire Steel Corp. of Texas v. Omni Steel Corp.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1964

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API