Legal Opinion

Commercial Energies, Inc. v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided April 16, 1990No. 90-300 CPublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

RADER, Judge.

In this bid protest action, plaintiff contests the application of a small disadvantaged business (SDB) preference to a United States Air Force (Air Force) contract for the supply of natural gas to Ellsworth Air Force Base, Minot Air Force Base, and Cavalier Air Force Station. Plaintiff, Commercial Energies, Inc. (CEI), protests that the Air Force did not apply the preference to all of the line items on which it intends to base its award. Defendant responds that the Air Force applied the preference factor properly.

After an extensive and enlightening oral argument, this…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. United States v. KingSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. Mingus Constructors, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
  4. M. Steinthal & Co., Inc. v. Robert J. Seamans, Jr., Secretary of the Air Force, Pioneer Parachute Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1971
  5. Barmag Barmer Maschinenfabrik Ag v. Murata MacHinery Ltd., and Murata of America, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Hydro Engineering, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1997
  2. CSE Construction Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2003
  3. Cube Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2000
  4. Vantage Associates, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2003
  5. Avtel Services, Inc. v. Unites StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2005

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API