Legal Opinion · Dissent

Teichman v. Potashnick Construction, Inc.

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided October 13, 1969No. 53645Published

1Dissent

STONE, Special Judge

(dissenting).

Reduced to the role of deferential dissent as the author of one of the rejected opinions, both of which reached a contrary conclusion to the principal opinion, I have no difficulty or hesitation in joining heartily in the familiar language of that opinion disallowing defendant’s preliminary contention, outlining the facts, and dealing with Assignments I and II. But, although entertaining appropriate respect for my brethren of the judiciary who grace the bench of this high court and have honored me by inviting my participation in consideration of this cause, I…

2Cases cited42 opinions

  1. Glanzer v. . ShepardNew York Court of Appeals · 1922
  2. Marks v. Nambil Realty Co., Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1927
  3. Buehler v. Festus Mercantile Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1938
  4. Ketcham v. ThomasSupreme Court of Missouri · 1955
  5. Kickham v. CarterSupreme Court of Missouri · 1958

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API