Legal Opinion

Cook v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided February 23, 1996No. 7 W.D. Appeal Docket 1995Published

1Dissent · ZappalaZappala, Justice

I dissent. I agree with the majority that the Commonwealth Court’s limitation of Bass v. Commonwealth, 485 Pa. 256, 401 A.2d 1133 (1979), to non-negligent acts of a third party, as distinguished from non-negligent acts of a party himself, leads to anomalous results. Rather than broaden the application of Bass to remove the anomaly, however, I would hold that Bass was wrongly decided and should not be used as a reference point for determining whether circumstances warrant the allowance of an appeal nunc pro tunc.1

Prior to Bass, it was uniformly held that an appeal nunc pro tunc would only be…

Also in this document: Dissent · Roberts.

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Bass v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  2. Nixon v. NixonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  3. In Re the Interest of C.K.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  4. Guat Gnoh Ho v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  5. Tuttle Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1946

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API