Legal Opinion

Koss v. State

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided February 5, 1935PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFritz, J.

The plaintiffs in error, hereinafter called the defendants, contend that a verdict finding each of them guilty of engaging in an unlawful assembly and riot in violation of sec. 347.02, Stats., is not supported by, and is contrary to, the evidence; and that the court’s instructions to the jury were *327erroneous, misleading, and prejudicial. A review of the record discloses that the evidence established the following facts beyond a reasonable doubt: On September 27, 1933, Dr. Luther, the German ambassador to the United States, was expected to arrive at about 1 p. m. at the Milwaukee Club, located…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Garrabad v. DeringWisconsin Supreme Court · 1893
  2. Barker v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1852
  3. Commonwealth v. SurridgeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1929
  4. Schutz v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1905
  5. Grabowski v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1905

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Sambs v. City of BrookfieldWisconsin Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Lodl v. Progressive Northern InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Johnson v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Guinther v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1935
  5. State v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1972

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API