OIL, LLC v. Stamax Corp.
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the CourtKuntz, J.
Petitioners, OIL, LLC and Maximiliano L. Russo, seek certiorari review of an order disqualifying their attorney based upon the court’s conclusion that counsel violated Florida Bar Rule 4-1.9. We grant the petition and quash the order because counsel for the Petitioners did not represent the Respondent and did not participate in confidential communications with the Respondent.
Background
Respondent, Stamax Corp., was the holder of a license from Apple Inc., allowing it to sell and service Apple products as an authorized reseller. Based on its agreement with Apple, Stamax operated a number of…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- People v. OsorioNew York Court of Appeals · 1989
- United States v. Ana Luisa Gordon-NikkarCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975
- United States v. Harlan Alexander BlackburnCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1971
- Holmes v. Bridgestone/Firestone, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2005
- Alexander v. Tandem Staffing SolutionsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2004
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.