Legal Opinion
In re United States
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided December 1, 1987No. Docket 87-3018PublishedCited by 43 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
VAN GRAAFEILAND, Circuit Judge:
The Government petitioned for a writ of mandamus pursuant to the All Writs Act, 28 U.S.C. § 1651, directing that Chief Judge Weinstein of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York vacate a discovery order entered in a multidefendant racketeering case. The order, professedly made pursuant to Fed.R. Crim.P. 16, Fed.R.Evid. 801, and the court’s “inherent power to require appropriate discovery”, required the Government to produce all oral statements made by the defendants and coconspirators that the Government planned to offer at trial as…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Palermo v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- In Re Claus Von Bulow, Martha Von Bulow, by Her Next Friends Alexander Auersperg, and Annie Laurie Auersperg-Kneissl v. Claus Von BulowCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1987
- United States v. PolizziCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1974
- Roberts v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by43 opinions
- United States v. BaileyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1997
- United States v. NachamieDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2000
- United States v. Bin LadenDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2000
- United States v. GiampaDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1995
- United States v. StrawberryDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1995
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.