Knapp v. State

OPINION

ON APPELLANT’S MOTION FOR REHEARING

ODOM, Judge.

In his motion for rehearing appellant has asserted five “points of error” which read as follows:

1. “The majority opinion of this Honorable Court does not correctly state the facts of this case and relies upon assumed facts not in evidence before the jury to affirm the conviction in this case. This Honorable Court, by assuming that the naked offer of State’s Exhibits la, lb, lc and Id into evidence, without other proof offered in support thereof connecting Appellant with the stamps reflected in these exhibits, constituted proof that . .…