Legal Opinion

Rodgers v. Clement

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 1, 1901PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal by the plaintiff, John C. Rodgers, from an order of the Supreme Court, made at the New York Special Term and entered in the office óf "the clerk of the county of New York on the 28th day of December, 1900, granting, upon terms, the motion of the defendant to be allowed to serve an amended answer.

1Opinion of the Court

Ingraham, J.:

This action was brought for a dissolution of a copartnership and for an accounting between copartners. The complaint alleged that the plaintiff had at various times loaned the said copartnership sums of money which have not been repaid. The answer denied this allegation, but admitted that the plaintiff did loan to the said copartnership certain sums of money, all of which were repaid to him. The action was tried before a referee and resulted in a judgment in favor of the defendant, against the plaintiff, for $5,280.87. Upon an appeal to the Appellate Division that judgment was…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Rodgers v. . ClementNew York Court of Appeals · 1900
  2. Rodgers v. ClementAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1897

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Rosenberg v. FeieringAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1908
  2. People ex rel. McDonald v. ClausenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1901

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API