Legal Opinion

McIvor v. Hynes

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 22, 1915No. Appeal, No. 146PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal, No. 146, Jan. T., 1914, by plaintiff, from judgment of O. P. No; 2, Philadelphia Co., March T., 1913, No. 3423, on verdict for defendant, in case of Margaret Mclvor v. Edward J. Hynes. Assumpsit on a judgment note. Before Sulzberger, P. J. The opinion of the Supreme Court states the facts. Verdict for defendant and judgment thereon. Plaintiff appealed.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Chief Justice Brown,

Margaret Mclvor, the appellant, entered a judgment for $7,000 in the court below against Edward J. Hynes, the appellee, on a note containing a warrant of attorney authorizing the entry of it. The judgment was subsequently opened upon the petition of the defendant, and, in the issue to determine whether he was indebted to the plaintiff in any sum secured by his said note, a verdict was returned in his favor. On this appeal from the judgment on it appellant’s main complaint is of the court’s refusal to instruct the jury that she was entitled to recover $2,500…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Phillips v. MeilySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1884
  2. Fuller v. LawSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1903
  3. Faux v. FitlerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1911

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Kline v. Fitzgerald Bros.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1920
  2. Dixon v. MinogueSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1923
  3. Jiles v. JilesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1916

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API