Legal Opinion

Ridley v. City of Detroit

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided October 9, 2001No. Docket 194350PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDoctoroff, J.

This case is before us on remand1 from the Supreme Court for reconsideration in light of Evens v Shiawassee Co Rd Comm’rs, 463 Mich 143; 615 NW2d 702 (2000). In our previous decision, we affirmed the trial court’s entry of judgment for plaintiff, rejecting defendant’s2 argument that plaintiff’s claim was barred by governmental immunity. Ridley v Detroit, 231 Mich App 381; 590 NW2d 69 (1998). After reviewing the Evens decision, we conclude that the Supreme Court’s modification of the highway exception to governmental immunity does not apply to the facts of this case and we reaffirm our…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Nawrocki v. MacOmb County Road CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Hall v. Department of State HighwaysMichigan Court of Appeals · 1981
  3. Ridley v. City of DetroitMichigan Court of Appeals · 1998
  4. Weakley v. City of Dearborn HeightsMichigan Court of Appeals · 2001

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Weaver v. City of DetroitMichigan Court of Appeals · 2002
  2. Johnson-McIntosh v. City of DetroitMichigan Court of Appeals · 2005
  3. Adams v. Department of TransportationMichigan Court of Appeals · 2003
  4. Marchyok v. City of Ann ArborMichigan Court of Appeals · 2004
  5. Johnson-McIntosh v. City of DetroitMichigan Court of Appeals · 2004

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API