Legal Opinion

Charlton v. Ward

New York Supreme Court

Decided January 15, 1918PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Action to foreclose a mortgage.

1Opinion of the CourtCropsey, J.

In an action to foreclose a mortgage the defendants plead as a counterclaim that the mortgage had an usurious inception and that the plaintiff was a party to and profited by the transaction. The plaintiff did not reply to the counterclaim and the case came on for trial, having been noticed by the plaintiff. Plaintiff introduced her proof and rested. The defendants then moved to dismiss the complaint, on the ground that plaintiff had not proved her cause of action. This motion being denied, the defendants introduced some evidence and then moved for judg*240ment on the counterclaim. Defendants’…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Jordan v. . National Shoe and Leather BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
  2. Equitable Life Assurance Society of United States v. CuylerNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
  3. Bullard v. . SherwoodNew York Court of Appeals · 1881
  4. Hopkins v. . LaneNew York Court of Appeals · 1882
  5. Bassett v. FrenchNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1895

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Tyler v. JahnNew York Supreme Court · 1919

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API