Legal Opinion

Garza v. State

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided October 12, 2000No. 48A05-0003-CR-106PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MATTINGLY, Judge

Gerónimo Garza appeals his conviction after a jury trial of stalking, 1 a Class D felony. Garza contends on appeal that there was insufficient evidence to sustain his conviction. 2

We affirm.

PACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

Garza was Rebecca Eglen’s supervisor when she worked for the Madison County Division of Family and Children Services in Anderson (“DFC”). In December 1994, Eglen began having problems with Garza because he gave her too many compliments directed toward her physical appearance and too much attention. ' Eglen testified that Garza’s daily and unusual comments…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Maul v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2000

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State v. RussellConnecticut Appellate Court · 2007
  2. State v. EllisSupreme Court of Vermont · 2009
  3. Andrews v. IvieIndiana Court of Appeals · 2011
  4. Huch v. MarrsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2003
  5. John Doe v. City of Lafayette, IndianaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2003

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API