Legal Opinion
Mercadante v. the City of Paterson
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided June 22, 1970PublishedCited by 34 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
111 N.J. Super. 35 (1970)
266 A.2d 611
THOMAS M. MERCADANTE AND MARIO OPROMOLLO, INDIVIDUALLY AND IN BEHALF OF ALL OTHERS SIMILARLY SITUATED, PLAINTIFFS,
v.
THE CITY OF PATERSON, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, AND THE BOARD OF FIRE AND POLICE COMMISSIONERS OF THE CITY OF PATERSON, DEFENDANTS.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Chancery Division.
Decided June 22, 1970.
Mr. Abram A. Lebson for plaintiffs (Messrs. Lebson and Prigoff, attorneys).
Mr. Joseph L. Conn for defendants.
MOUNTAIN, J.S.C.
Plaintiffs Thomas M. Mercadante and Mario Opromollo are, respectively, a duly appointed…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Kennedy v. City of NewarkSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1959
- State v. BennySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1955
- Isola v. Borough of BelmarNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1955
- Duncan v. Board of Fire & Police CommissionersSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1944
- State v. AttiSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1941
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- James v. Prince George's CountyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1980
- Ector v. City of TorranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
- Fagiano v. Police Board of City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1983
- Krzewinski v. KuglerDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1972
- HATTIESBURG FIREF'T'RS v. City of HattiesburgMississippi Supreme Court · 1972
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.