Legal Opinion

In re Estate of Agioritis

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 29, 1976PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBirns, J.

For the first time we are called upon to construe and apply that provision of the Estates, Powers and Trusts Law (EPTL) which provides a surviving spouse with the right to treat as a testamentary substitute money deposited in Totten trust savings bank accounts after August 31, 1966 (EPTL 5-1.1, subd [b], par [1], cl [B]).

Petitioner initiated a proceeding in the Surrogate’s Court, as the surviving spouse of the decedent Peter Agioritis, to obtain a determination as to validity and effect of her election under said EPTL 5-1.1 (subd [b], par [1], cl [B]) to take a share of his estate. Petitioner…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Newman v. DoreNew York Court of Appeals · 1937
  2. In re HalpernNew York Court of Appeals · 1951
  3. Bodner v. FeitAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1936
  4. In re the Estate of KleinermanNew York Surrogate's Court · 1971
  5. In re the Estate of GrossmanNew York Surrogate's Court · 1972

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. In re the Estate of AgioritisNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
  2. Butler v. New York City Health & Hospitals Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
  3. In re the Estate of RiefbergNew York Surrogate's Court · 1980
  4. Matter of Makhani v. KieselAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2022
  5. Matter of Makhani v. KieselAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2022

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API