Legal Opinion

Romines v. K & S Engineering & Contracting Co.

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided October 3, 1977PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

COOPER, Chief Justice.

This appeal presents the question: When properly attacked by motion, can counterpart service of process be sustained where the only resident defendant was dismissed *86by the trial judge in ruling on motions filed preliminary to trial? We hold that it cannot.

For the purpose of this appeal, the record shows that Jack Romines was injured in an automobile accident that occurred in Rutherford County, Tennessee. Mr. Romines and his wife filed actions in Knox County, Tennessee, to recover damages resulting from the accident, naming as defendants the United States Gypsum…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Deaton v. EvansTennessee Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Isbell v. StriderTennessee Supreme Court · 1951

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Chrisman, Clark M., Jr., Mechanics Adjustors, Inc. and Marine Adjustors, Inc. v. Electrastart of Houston, Inc. D/B/A Mobile Car Doctor, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2003
  2. The Bogatin Law Firm v. Hallum MotorsCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API