Bell v. Parks
Supreme Court of Kansas
Error from Osage District Court. At the November Term 1875 of the district court, Paries recovered judgment against Bell and another, on a promissory note dated 26th September, 1872. .Bell appeals, and brings the case here on error.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Brewer, J.:
Action on a promissory note. Defense, failure of consideration, and counterclaim. A demurrer to the answer was sustained, and this is the alleged error. The allegations of the answer were, that Parks was residing on a quarter-section of the Sac-and-Fox lands; that shortly after the note and deed hereinafter referred to, by treaty between the United States and the Sac-and-Fox Indians these lands became subject to preemption by actual settlers; that Parks quitclaimed all his right, title and interest in said lands to Bell for $2,000, of which…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Brewster v. MaddenSupreme Court of Kansas · 1875
- Moore v. McIntoshSupreme Court of Kansas · 1870
- Vickroy v. PrattSupreme Court of Kansas · 1871
3Cited by6 opinions
- Coleman v. the Territory of OklahomaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1897
- Tecumseh State Bank v. MaddoxSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1896
- Lapham v. HeadSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1878
- Putnam Investment Co. v. KingSupreme Court of Kansas · 1915
- Merriman v. BlantonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1881
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.